Weekly Update (21w09)
Anniversary #1, tons of impulse-reading, my first few interviews, and some "funnies."
Oops, this is going out on Monday. A trial by fire of my accountability system, to be sure, and one that worked: after forgetting to write my weekly update on time, four people contacted me asking where it was! š
Itās really late asI write this (almost so late that itās early), so this will be a bit shorter than normal. Better than skipping, I figured!
I. Anniversary #1
Mattea and I got married a year (and 8 days) ago! Last Sunday (February 28) was the day, but we didnāt really do much to celebrateāso, on Wednesday, we went skiing for each of our second times. We also walked 3 miles to the nearest grocery store on Thursday, to get a tub of ice cream and make milkshakes with our expired bananas!
[I would insert a picture of us skiing here, but keep leaving my phone in the car.]
She got me an awesome gift (two, one was āfor Valentineās Dayā): leather-bound copies of āEnderās Gameā and its lesser-known sequel āSpeaker For The Deadā (a transparent allegory which still manages to be one of my all-time favorite books). Turns out that premium leather-bound book publishers arenāt exactly the most prompt with their on online order shipping, so they got here a week or two lateāgo figure.
All of it was amazingāthe skiing, the milkshakes, and the books. ā¤ļø
II. What good are books, if you donāt read them?
In a conversation earlier this evening, I was discussing āvicesā with some friends here at Edyfi. Doing irrational but enjoyable things, someone argued, is the way we assert our humanity: if we let our tasks and structures and schedules and hierarchies consume us entirely, we might as well be robots, right?
I like the way that sounds. I didnāt flagrantly abdicate any responsibility I might have had in any non-work (hi, Chrisman!) realm this weekā¦ I just, um, asserted my humanity.
āEnderās Gameā came in on Tuesday morning; āSpeaker For The Deadā (do I capitalize those middle words? maybe? gah!) on Wednesday. By 7:45 PM on Thursday, Iād finished both of them, from cover to cover. 5 hours each, 10 total.
For those keeping score, that means that I spent more (non-work) time reading than not reading for three days straight. It was totally worth it, tooāthat series continues to be a pinnacle of literature in my eyes, evidence that the English language can truly sing at unimaginable heights.
Then, because I still didnāt want to find and call a local mechanic, I picked up a copy of the King James Bible and started reading from Esther onwards (timely, as a Jewish friend here informed meāPurim was just last week). After that, I figured itās been long enough since I read āJulius Caesar,ā (right?), and Shakespeare was practically staring at me from the shelf, so how could I resistā¦
Impulse reading is my vice. At least I picked a good one!
III. I wonder what itās like for interviews to go well
Last week, Iād never interviewed anyone before. Now, Iāve only never interviewed someone I didnāt veto immediately afterward! (Thatās 0-3, for those keeping score.)
First up was an intern candidate for Synthesis; my job was to figure out if they were fluent in JavaScript. I picked a pretty fun question: āimplement the ranked choice voting algorithm.ā Itās nice, simple, and open-ended, while giving people enough rope to hang themselves if theyāre just faking it.
Thatās what I thought, at least. After watching an otherwise competently-presenting sophomore flounder for 1.5 hours straight, though, I decided to take my own medicine and implement the code in two programming languages. 10-15 minutes each. Hm.
Next intern. HOLY CRAP. Have you ever felt so bad for someone that you just want to curl up and die a painful death or two of shame for them? I had made the mistake of scheduling our interview for a full hour and a halfāafter 10 minutes, I knew it would be quite the ride. Hereās a sample of the code this candidate wrote in five whole minutes:
minVotes = Math.min(...roundVotes);
Haha, just kidding. Thatās how it was after I gave them the half of the necessary syntax! Thankfully, the code environment we were sharing crashed after half the allotted time; Iāve never felt so conspicuously free before.
(I donāt think Iām being mean? Very sorry, intern candidate #1 at least (#2 had no hope at all), if my expectations are too unreasonable when starting off at this.)
I also interviewed a candidate for Edyfiās summer houses, who couldnāt stop dropping names for 5 minutes to talk about his values or motivation. Apparently, if your dad is the [semi-important position] at [prominent US agency] while youāre growing up, you āget tired of admirals and astronauts coming over for dinner twice a week.ā When someone spends more time talking about the 12 billionaires that invested in their failed startup than giving any hint of having a personality, I donāt want to live with them. š¤·āāļø
(I feel really bad judging peopleāespecially when it requires negative conclusions. Iād rather just stick to judging myself in the future, but unfortunately it seems necessary.)
IV. Bonus āfunniesā (courtesy of nearby old lady)
When Mattea and I were on a long walk last Sunday, looping around through an unfamiliar suburb on our way back to the house, a short old lady swooped out of her driveway to walk alongside us and ātell us funniesā on the way back.
Here are some of her best jokes:
Whatās as big as an elephant, but doesnāt weigh anything? (Its shadow)
Which part of your body hangs onto life the longest? (Your eyes, because they dilate (ādie lateā))
Apparently most people shake her off after a few dozen feetāwe listened to her (it was mainly her talking) for 5-10 minutes. It feels good to spread some empathy in these lonely times! š
Worth the wait. There's nothing a banana milkshake doesn't make better.
Encouraging your vice, as youāre familiar with me repeating myself, hereās a recommendation, ...again - Henryk Sienkiewiczā trilogy starting with With Fire & Sword. This time though Iām backing it with a link to someone elseās recommendation -
http://www.brothersjudd.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/reviews.detail/book_id/1061/
In this review the author had found it nearly impossible to find The Deluge (2nd Book). I own it and first read it when I was just older than you are now. He also acknowledges getting through the Polish names as āsledding.ā I agree, but found learning to read the names and pronouncing them fun.
Also, as this Sienkiewicz book review is about Quo Vadis, one of the most purchased books ever, having been translated in to 50 languages, Iāll acknowledge that I am just getting back to it. I hadnāt originally finished reading it.